416,434 views
18 votes
18 votes
Help please
Why drug testing doesn't violate the constitution?

User Bparry
by
2.6k points

2 Answers

14 votes
14 votes
It will arrest those who are drug addict
User Andile
by
3.0k points
13 votes
13 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In two 1989 decisions the Court held that no warrant, probable cause, or even individualized suspicion is required for mandatory drug testing of certain classes of railroad and public employees. In each case, “special needs beyond the normal need for law enforcement” were identified as justifying the drug testing. In Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives’ ,381 the Court upheld regulations requiring railroads to administer blood, urine, and breath tests to employees involved in certain train accidents or violating certain safety rules; in National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab382 the Court upheld a Customs Service screening program requiring urine testing of employees seeking transfer or promotion to positions having direct involvement with drug interdiction, or to positions requiring the incumbent to carry firearms.

User Guradio
by
3.0k points