Question

Advocates for organic farming claim that their methods result in a number of benefits to farmers, consumers, and the environment. Scientists now plan to study the claims that organic farming advocates make by developing testable hypotheses about the economic and environmental benefits of growing organic foods. The scientists plan to collect data from farmers and other producers. Which hypothesis should the scientists use

Answer 1

Scientists could use hypotheses such as 'Organic farming practices enhance biodiversity and soil health' and 'Organic production systems are more cost-effective and beneficial to local economies' to test the claims made by organic farming advocates.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question revolves around the scientific investigation of the claims made by advocates of organic farming. Scientists aim to develop testable hypotheses to assess the economic and environmental benefits claimed. One possible hypothesis for such a study could be: 'Organic farming practices lead to a significant increase in biodiversity and soil health compared to conventional farming methods.' This hypothesis is directly related to claims that organic farming enhances environmental quality and promotes ecological balance. Another hypothesis might be, 'Organic food production systems are more cost-effective and beneficial for local economies than conventional systems.' Considering the importance of sustainable agriculture in both economic and environmental contexts, these hypotheses would enable researchers to evaluate the purported benefits of organic farming in terms of biodiversity, soil health, local economic growth, and environmental impact. Additionally, by studying the shift in consumer demand towards organic foods, another hypothesis could focus on economic factors: 'Increased consumer demand for organic foods leads to a more significant economic return for farmers than conventional farming.'

Answer 2

''Organic farming reduces the cost of farming that benefits the farmers economically and also better the environment.''

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypothesis i.e. ''Organic farming reduces the cost of farming that benefits the farmers economically and also better the environment.'' This hypothesis can be tested by the scientists by taking two fields in different location having same environmental conditions. One field they apply conventional farming whereas other field apply only organic materials and no chemicals. We can see that the cost on expensive fertilizers, pesticides and weedicides can't used in organic farming so it is economically benefitted to the farmers as well as no pollution occurs which happens due to the use of chemicals. Moreover, the price of organic food is 3 times higher due to its non-hazardous nature.