Question

Can u help me pls?

6. PART A
What is the meaning of the word suppress as it is used in paragraph 10 of “Fashion Police”?
A support
B hold back
C express
D promote

PART B
How does Principal Jaggon support the idea that “dress codes aren’t meant to suppress free speech”?
A by reminding the reader that the First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech
B by arguing that having a dress code reduces bullying
C by emphasizing that school is a place where academics are first and foremost
D by suggesting that clothing isn’t the only way to show individuality

7. “No More Saggy Pants” describes a law in Florida that bans saggy pants. Based on what you know about
Dionne Jaggon’s point of view in “Fashion Police,” do you think she would be in favor of this law? Use text
evidence to support your answer.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Which choice best describes how the focus of “Fashion Police” differs from the focus of “No More Saggy Pants”?
A “Fashion Police” focuses on only one side of the dress code debate,
while “No More Saggy Pants” provides various opinions.
B “Fashion Police” provides a general overview of school dress codes,
while “No More Saggy Pants” focuses on a type of law.
C “Fashion Police” is about what kids can and can’t wear to school,
while “No More Saggy Pants” focuses on appropriate clothing in all public spaces.
D “Fashion Police” describes consequences for not following the dress code,
while “No More Saggy Pants” explains the reasons behind having a dress code at school.

9. Which idea is presented in both texts?
A Students are more likely to follow the school dress code if it is enforced by state law.
B Schools that require uniforms have less bullying than schools that don’t.
C The U.S. Constitution states what is considered appropriate schoolwear.
D At many schools, students face consequences for not following the dress code.

10. In “No More Saggy Pants,” one argument in favor of the ban on saggy pants is that it “can improve the
learning environment in schools.” Which detail from “Fashion Police” best supports this claim?
A “Dyed hair, tank tops, and ripped jeans are among the fashion no-no’s at many schools.”
B “People should have their hair styled however they want.”
C “How well you communicate is true self-expression.”
D “Dionne Jaggon ... says switching to uniforms helped cut down on bullying and distractions in class.”

Answer 1

Part A is answer B- "hold back." :)

I think part B is answer C- "By emphasizing that a school is a place where academics are first and foremost."

7. I think Dione Jaggons would definetly support the laws put in "No More Saggy Pants" as well. Dione doesn't support someone just having a faux hawk, so she most likely wouldn't support someone wearing saggy pants to school.

8. I believe the correct answer is C- "Fashion Police” is about what kids can and can’t wear to school, while “No More Saggy Pants” focuses on appropriate clothing in all public spaces.

9. I believe the correct answer is C- "The U.S. Constitution states what is considered appropriate schoolwear."

10. A- "Dyed hair, tank tops, and ripped jeans are among the fashion no-no’s at many schools.” seems to be the most reasonable answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

I read over multiple times and believe those are the best answers to the questions.

I apoligize if any of the answers are incorrect. ;(

Hope this helps! <3