316,829 views
36 votes
36 votes
Then, use the information you have learned from the article and throughout the lesson to complete this charting activity. Three topics are provided; you can include up to two more of interest. Include informed opinion about how and whether the changes occurring in the South represented successes or failures in Reconstruction. Then, write an editorial evaluating progress (or lack thereof). Be sure your editorial is clear in its stance, and cite specific examples to support your opinion.

User Michaud
by
2.6k points

1 Answer

19 votes
19 votes

Answer:

Following are the response to the given question:

Step-by-step explanation:

Economy:

However, as the economics of northeastern states, reconstruction intended to leave the economy of the heat Sources without the use of slaves. The concept was certainly very lovely, but the way this was developed did not happen. In the first years of rebuilding, the states in the south endured heavy economic repression and although they were able to recover the economy with time, they rarely achieved whatever the northern countries present.

Politics:

This rebuilding tried to limit Southern's democratic engagement, had no beneficial outcomes as there was a southern American regime with times of abuse of power and indifference of North leaders who thought it essential to punish Southern. Furthermore, the standards and regs in the area stimulated racism and systemic racism, which show that the reconstruction program could not accomplish its objectives.

Education:

The goal was that classrooms would be built in the south such that people would have complete access to education. Nevertheless, there are still no projects showing the necessity of building schools, although the structures were being built by the people in the north. Such schools were spurned by Southerners and demolished by their youngsters for concern that the northern ideals were contaminated, and so this tactic for the restoration of a South failed once again.

Editorial:

While the rebuilding purpose was positive, it can be said that it was not performed efficiently. This because rehabilitation did not diminish the rejection and disdain of northern people. This issue should be debated during the reconstruction. The absence of dialogue about this subject means the public reject the rebuilding techniques proposed by the government and all the plans failed.

User Saurav Saha
by
3.4k points