Question

Devin was arrested and tried for embezzlement. After deliberating for three days, the jury informed the judge that it was hopelessly deadlocked and could not reach a verdict. The judge declared a mistrial and scheduled a new trial. Devin objected, contending that a second trial constituted double jeopardy. Is he correct? Explain.

Answer 1

Devin is wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

A fresh trial was ordered when the judge declared a mistrial. Devin opposed it. In this case, Devin is wrong, it is not a double jeopardy. Double Jeopardy means a person cannot be put on trial twice for the same offense. However, Devin was never acquitted of the charges. It was a mistrial case because the jury was unable to decide.