Answer:
According to liberalism's take on trade, the factor that does NOT reduce the likelihood of war is:
Trade leads to greater economic power, which allows states to deter each other.
Liberalism argues that economic interdependence and trade between states lead to mutual benefits and shared interests. When states engage in trade, they become economically interdependent, which, in turn, is believed to reduce the likelihood of war. The other options listed are in alignment with the liberal perspective on trade:
The opportunity costs of war: When states engage in trade, they recognize that the costs of war, in terms of disrupting trade and economic prosperity, are high. This recognition reduces the likelihood of war.
Domestic interest groups push for peace: Liberal theory suggests that economic interests and pressure from domestic interest groups that benefit from trade can influence a state's foreign policy choices, including promoting peace and cooperation.
Interactions produce similar interests: Trade and interactions between states can lead to the development of similar interests, common values, and shared norms, which can promote cooperation and reduce the likelihood of conflict.
So, according to liberalism, trade and economic interdependence are seen as factors that reduce the likelihood of war, rather than leading to greater economic power for deterrence.
Step-by-step explanation: