Answer:
In Ron Jones's classroom experiment, when he invented a social movement called the Third Wave, several significant events occurred:
1. The creation of a tightly controlled group: Ron Jones established strict rules and procedures within the Third Wave movement. Students were required to adhere to a set of principles, which included discipline, unity, and unquestioning loyalty to the movement.
2. An increase in student engagement and participation: The Third Wave gained popularity and attracted a significant number of students who were initially intrigued by the idea of a unified movement. Many students actively participated in various activities, including saluting and reciting slogans, attending rallies, and reporting on fellow students who violated the rules.
3. The emergence of a strong sense of identity and purpose: As the movement gained momentum, students began to identify strongly with the Third Wave. They developed a collective sense of purpose and pride, often feeling superior to others who were not part of the movement.
4. The normalization of authoritarianism: With Ron Jones assuming a dictatorial role as the leader of the Third Wave, authoritarian practices became commonplace. Students started to enforce rules, punish dissenters, and suppress individuality, creating an atmosphere of fear and control within the classroom.
5. The unraveling of the experiment: As the experiment progressed, the negative consequences of the authoritarian environment became evident. Some students began to question the ethics and values of the movement, leading to dissent and resistance. Ultimately, Ron Jones decided to end the experiment after just five days due to the potential dangers and moral implications of the Third Wave movement.
It is important to note that Ron Jones's experiment was intended to illustrate the power of group dynamics and the potential for manipulation within social movements. The experiment served as a cautionary tale about the dangers of blindly following authority and the importance of critical thinking and individual autonomy.