Final answer:
The question focuses on applying critical thinking to writing effectively. It emphasizes how argument writing should be structured, using a foundation of evidence and reasoning, and including counterarguments and rebuttals, leading to a solid conclusion that aligns with the topic sentence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student has posed a question involving critical thinking and its application to writing, particularly with respect to creating structured and persuasive arguments. The passage suggests that effective argument writing is analogous to architectural construction, where one lays a foundation (the thesis), then supports it with strong evidence (the beams), and finally builds upon it to form a solid structure or conclusion (the walls).
This process includes the ability to critically assess information and evidence (critical analysis), to consider counterclaims, and to ultimately draw a conclusion that ties back to the original topic sentence. An important aspect of critical writing is to follow a structured approach where writing reflects a logical thought pattern. This entails the utilization of evidence, such as quotations, paraphrases, analogies, and examples, to back up claims made in the thesis.
Furthermore, it involves addressing potential counterarguments and providing a rebuttal to strengthen the argument. Effective critical thinking also necessitates evaluating the credibility of evidence and the validity of reasoning used in the argument. Finally, the writer should conclude each paragraph by analyzing the evidence provided and relating it directly to the topic sentence to reinforce the argument's coherence and persuasiveness.