Question

Regarding the role played by the “victim” in deadlock resolution, give an example of such a deadlock in real life and explain your answers to these questions.

a. Describe how you might choose the victim to be removed and the consequences, both positive and negative, of that removal.

b. Describe the fate of the victim and the chances of eventually completing its processing.

c. Describe the actions required, if any, to complete the victim’s tasks. ​

Answer 1

The role of the 'victim' in deadlock resolution can be equated to a car being removed from a gridlock at a busy intersection to restore traffic flow. The car's journey is delayed but not denied, and alternative actions, such as rerouting, may be needed. Trust issues in collective action problems like the prisoner's dilemma can require third-party intervention to restore cooperation.

Step-by-step explanation:

When discussing the role of the 'victim' in deadlock resolution, a real-life example might be a busy intersection with traffic from all directions coming to a standstill, creating a gridlock. In this scenario, one might choose a 'victim' to be removed based on specific criteria, such as the size of the vehicle or its position in the traffic jam.

The consequences of this removal would include positive outcomes such as the restoration of traffic flow. However, negatively, the removed 'victim' − the car and its driver − may face a delay in reaching their destination.

The fate of the 'victim' would largely depend on how readily they can reintegrate into the traffic flow. The chances of completing its processing, or journey, would be delayed but not necessarily denied.

Should alternative routes be available, the 'victim' can take these to reach their destination, although this may involve additional time or distance. To complete the victim's tasks, actions such as rerouting or assistance from traffic management authorities may be required.

In the context of collective action problems like the prisoner's dilemma, the removal of trust between parties, as seen in long-standing geopolitical conflicts, can create a scenario where cooperation becomes difficult. Once trust is lost, and one party 'defects', restoring cooperation may require the involvement of a neutral third party to enforce agreements or punish defection in order to encourage future cooperation.

Answer 2

Here the answer is given as follows,

Step-by-step explanation:

The real-life situation of a deadlock resolution where a role is played by the victim is given as follows:

Example: An example of such a situation are often a one-way lane where the flow of traffic is merely in a method. Thus, on just one occasion, the flow of traffic can enter one direction only. Each entrance/exit gate is often considered a resource. during this case, if two cars are coming from both the entrances and that they are often considered as two tasks, then one among the cars must copy or we will say hand over its resource in order that the opposite car gets the prospect to first cross the lane or we will say the opposite task gets executed.

a) Victim: The steps which describe how a victim is chosen are given as follows :

The task which is terminated so as to interrupt things of deadlock is taken into account because of the victim.

There are often a variety of job pools that will be under a deadlock situation and therefore the victim is usually a low-priority task in order that the performance isn't affected that much and termination of this task doesn't cause any effect on the opposite jobs.

the main positive effect of selecting and terminating a victim is that things of deadlock are resolved and every one of the tasks can execute now.

The negative effect is that the task that's chosen because the victim is terminated and is executed at the previous. This whole process for choosing a victim then terminating it then restarting it again may consume some longer also.

b) An easy deadlock priority is often set. this suggests that the victim’s task or the task is often terminated so as to interrupt the deadlock and other jobs can finish executing. After this, the task which is terminated are often later restarted and every one of the tasks can then execute without a deadlock.

c) When employment gets terminated, the knowledge associated with it's stored. Are often This is often done in order that the work can be restarted again and therefore the information in it's not lost. Since the progress of the victim is stopped. Thus, the sole thanks to complete the victim’s task would be to start out it again. But before restarting the task, this must be considered that the victim’s task doesn't cause any deadlock within the system.