The author believes that linear thinkers, including "many promising students," even when judged by other linear thinkers, "failed to reach the highest levels of achievement" because they are too focused on following a set path and not flexible enough to adapt to change.
Linear thinkers are good at following a set of instructions and completing tasks in a logical order. However, they can be inflexible and resistant to change. This can be a problem in the workplace, where the environment is constantly changing.
For example, a linear thinker might be able to do well in school, where the curriculum is predictable and there are clear expectations. However, they might struggle in a job where the work is more ambiguous and there is a need to be flexible and adaptable.
The author argues that linear thinkers need to learn to be more flexible and adaptable if they want to reach the highest levels of achievement. They need to be able to think outside the box and come up with creative solutions to problems. They also need to be able to adapt to change and be willing to take risks.
Here are some specific examples of how linear thinkers can be inflexible and resistant to change:
* They may have a hard time dealing with ambiguity or uncertainty.
* They may be reluctant to try new things or take risks.
* They may be more focused on following the rules than on getting the job done.
If linear thinkers can learn to be more flexible and adaptable, they will be more likely to reach their full potential. They will be able to succeed in a variety of settings and be more creative and innovative in their work.