Answer:
A movement against civil rights protections led by conservative groups in the United States has often included opposition to LGBTQIA+ rights. In response, LGBTQIA+ groups have employed various strategies to fight for their civil rights protections.
Option A is a correct answer. LGBTQIA+ groups have often organized marches, rallies, and boycotts to draw national attention to their cause and to pressure lawmakers to pass laws protecting their rights. For example, in 1987, thousands of LGBTQIA+ activists marched on Washington, D.C. to demand an end to discrimination against LGBTQIA+ people.
Option B is not an incorrect answer, but it is less commonly used as a strategy by LGBTQIA+ groups. While some LGBTQIA+ activists have run for political office and have been successful in winning elections, this is not typically a widespread strategy for fighting for civil rights protections.
Option C is not an incorrect answer, but it is also not typical of the strategies employed by LGBTQIA+ groups. While the Supreme Court has played a critical role in advancing LGBTQIA+ rights in the United States, LGBTQIA+ groups have not typically marched directly to the Supreme Court to demand that laws protecting their civil rights be upheld.
Option D is incorrect. The Reagan administration was not supportive of LGBTQIA+ rights, and LGBTQIA+ groups did not work with the administration to ensure federal support for civil rights protections. In fact, during the Reagan years, the federal government was often hostile to LGBTQIA+ rights, with policies like the ban on openly gay people serving in the military and the failure to address the AIDS crisis.