Answer:
- A German historian might define World War II as a catastrophic failure of Nazi ideology and aggression that resulted in unprecedented destruction, suffering, and guilt for Germany and its people. A German historian might also examine the causes and consequences of the war from a political, economic, social, and moral perspective, as well as the challenges of coming to terms with the past and rebuilding a democratic society.
- A Russian historian might define World War II as a heroic struggle of the Soviet Union against the fascist invaders that inflicted enormous sacrifices but also secured a decisive victory and a global superpower status for the USSR. A Russian historian might also emphasize the role of Stalin's leadership, the resilience of the Soviet people, and the contribution of the Red Army to the liberation of Europe.
- A British historian might define World War II as a global conflict that threatened the survival of Britain and its empire but also demonstrated its courage, endurance, and innovation. A British historian might also highlight the importance of Churchill's rhetoric, the Battle of Britain, the Blitz, the Commonwealth allies, and the special relationship with the United States.