Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court has issued various rulings regarding the use of force by law enforcement officers. In the case of Graham v. Connor (1989), the Court established a "reasonableness" standard for evaluating the use of force by police officers under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
According to the ruling, when evaluating the use of force, a court should consider the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than using hindsight. The court should take into account the severity of the crime, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether the suspect is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.
The Court also stated that the use of force should be evaluated based on the totality of the circumstances, and that the use of nondeadly force may be excessive if it is not proportionate to the threat posed by the suspect. Therefore, when judging whether the use of nondeadly force is excessive, the court should consider the totality of the circumstances, including the severity of the crime, the threat posed by the suspect, and the proportionality of the force used.