79.2k views
5 votes
Free Exercise Scenario

Scenario A
A State law bans the use of poisonous snakes in religious ceremonies
even if the participants wish to use them.
Scenario B
A State law requires religious groups to obtain permits before
holding parades on public streets.
How has the Supreme Court ruled in cases involving free exercise of religion such as those described in the table?
O Both of these laws are constitutional because they protect the public good in a way that overrides the Free Exercise Clause.
The ban on snakes is unconstitutional because it limits personal choice, but the permit requirement protects public safety and is
constitutional.
The ban on snakes is constitutional because it protects health, but the permit requirement is biased against religious groups and
is unconstitutional.
O Both of these laws are unconstitutional because they unfairly restrict religious activity protected by the Free Exercise Clause.

Free Exercise Scenario Scenario A A State law bans the use of poisonous snakes in-example-1

1 Answer

3 votes
I think the answer is A. Both of these laws are constitutional because they protect the public good in a way that overrides the Free Exercise Clause.
User Alexander Bily
by
8.6k points