The media personality's argument is flawed because they are basing their conclusion on a single year's data and ignoring the overall trend of increasing global temperatures. To counter this argument, one can make the following points:
1. While it is true that the annual increase in temperature may be less than the margin of error, the trend of increasing temperatures over several decades cannot be ignored. The margin of error is a statistical concept that takes into account the uncertainty in the measurement, but it does not negate the overall trend.
2. Global temperature records show that the Earth's temperature has been steadily rising over the past century, with the 10 warmest years on record occurring since 2005. This trend cannot be explained by natural variability alone and is consistent with the effects of human-caused climate change.
3. The consequences of rising global temperatures, such as melting glaciers, rising sea levels, and more frequent extreme weather events, are already being felt around the world. Ignoring this trend could have devastating consequences for future generations.
In summary, the media personality's argument is based on a flawed understanding of statistics and ignores the overall trend of increasing global temperatures. The best counterargument is to highlight the overwhelming evidence of climate change and its potential consequences.