173k views
4 votes
25. which of the following best explains why the painting was seen as a challenge to social conventions when it was painted? (a) women were rarely the subject of paintings in european art of the period. (b) caribbean society was built on racial hierarchies that generally reserved elite status for people of european ancestry. (c) in most cultures of the period, children were not considered worthy of being portrayed in art until they reached adulthood. (d) caribbean society was predominantly matriarchal, with men expected to play strictly domestic roles in the household

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

Casta paintings challenged Caribbean societal norms by depicting individuals from various racial and social backgrounds, contradicting the rigid racial hierarchies where elite status was usually reserved for those of European ancestry.

Step-by-step explanation:

The painting referred to in the question is likely a casta painting, which was created during the colonial era to represent the racial and social stratification of the time. The correct answer to the question of why the painting was seen as a challenge to social conventions would be:

  • (b) Caribbean society was built on racial hierarchies that generally reserved elite status for people of European ancestry.

This is because these paintings, including those by Agostino Brunias who depicted free women of color, challenged the rigid social hierarchy of the period. They often presented an image of social mobility and fluidity that was at odds with the prevalent strict segregation based on race. The Caribbean society of the time was known for its complex caste system, which categorized people based on their racial makeup, with peninsular Spaniards at the top and mixed races placed hierarchically below. The fact that casta paintings depicted individuals from different social and racial backgrounds challenged the interpretation and enforcement of these societal norms.

User Nicolas Belley
by
7.4k points
1 vote

Answer:

Based on the options provided, the best explanation for why the painting was seen as a challenge to social conventions when it was painted is option (a), which states that women were rarely the subject of paintings in European art of the period.

During the period in which the painting was created, women were often portrayed as passive and subservient to men in art, and their roles were typically limited to domestic settings. The painting in question, therefore, challenged traditional gender roles and social conventions by portraying a woman as the central focus of the artwork. This would have been seen as a departure from the norm and may have been considered controversial or even scandalous at the time.

User Kiang Teng
by
8.2k points