183,704 views
1 vote
1 vote
Sanabria argues that anthropology has largely sidestepped the isssue of mass violence terror and fear what are some the reasons

User Kas Elvirov
by
2.5k points

2 Answers

16 votes
16 votes
Sanabria contends that the problems of widespread violence, terrorism, and death have been largely ignored by anthropology. What are some of the explanations he provides for why anthropologists have avoided these difficult topics? Compare this to a few of Dr. Bellino's Guatemalan encounters.
User Nutario
by
3.0k points
21 votes
21 votes

Answer:

Sanabria argues that anthropology has largely sidestepped the issue of mass violence, terror, and fear for a variety of reasons. One reason may be that these topics are considered too sensitive or controversial to study in a rigorous and objective manner. Another reason may be that these issues are perceived as being outside the purview of anthropology, which is traditionally focused on studying cultural and social phenomena rather than political and security-related issues.

Sanabria also suggests that anthropology may have avoided studying mass violence, terror, and fear because these phenomena are often associated with war and conflict, which can be difficult and dangerous to study in the field. Researchers may also face challenges in obtaining funding or institutional support for such studies, as they may be perceived as too risky or politically sensitive. Finally, Sanabria suggests that anthropology may have avoided these topics because they require a multidisciplinary approach that combines insights from fields such as psychology, political science, and security studies, which may be outside the comfort zone of many anthropologists.

User Ghchinoy
by
3.2k points