113,358 views
6 votes
6 votes
A literary critic stated that the Necklace is not just a story pointing to a moral, such as "Honesty is the best policy” but a story showing that in people's lives, “blind chance rules. " Do you agree or disagree with the critic? Explain why

User BnMcGn
by
3.0k points

1 Answer

17 votes
17 votes

Answer:

I agree with the critic's assessment of "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant. In the story, the main character, Mathilde, borrows a valuable necklace to wear to a fancy event, but ends up losing it and is forced to spend the next ten years working to pay off the debt incurred from replacing it. The fact that Mathilde loses the necklace due to a series of events that are largely out of her control, such as a broken clasp and the fact that the necklace is not found when she and her husband search for it, suggests that blind chance plays a significant role in the story.

Additionally, the consequences of Mathilde's actions, such as her decision to borrow the necklace and her inability to confess the truth to her husband, are severe and lasting, further emphasizing the idea that blind chance can have significant impacts on people's lives. Overall, the story illustrates the idea that people's lives can be greatly affected by events that are beyond their control, and that the consequences of their actions can have long-lasting impacts.

I hope it helps, let me know if you have any questions

User Susheel
by
2.7k points