205k views
4 votes
1. What is the perspective of the reading, "Let's Support School Uniforms"? Identify at least two things about this writer that most likely helped shape that perspective. How might the writer's background or experiences affect what the writer says or how it is said?

2. What is the purpose of this text? What is the author trying to achieve and how do you know? What reasons does the author offer in support of this purpose? What evidence does the author use to support these reasons?

3. The author has a clear opinion, but in what ways might the writer be biased as well? Give at least two possible clues that the author's understanding of the issue is based on bias. How does each affect the effectiveness of the author's argument?

4. Identify at least one example of pathos in the text. Explain how this appeal helps the author's purpose.

5. Identify at least one example of ethos in the text. Explain how this appeal helps the author's purpose.


6. Identify at least one example of logos in the text. Explain how this appeal helps the author's purpose.

7. Identify at least two rhetorical devices in the text. These may include direct address, juxtaposition, an analogy, or a rhetorical question. Explain how these rhetorical devices help the author's purpose.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The internet should be free.Supporting reasons:The internet is a necessity in today's world for communication, education, and access to information.The current system of charging for access to the internet
\sqrt[n]{x} Shahhaa inequality and restricts access to information for those who cannot afford it.The internet is a public resource, and therefore should be available to all without cost.The essay “The Internet Should Be Free” uses various types of evidence to support its claims, including statistics, expert opinions, and examples. For instance, the essay cites statistics about the digital divide and the percentage of people who cannot afford internet access. It also uses expert opinions from scholars and advocates for free internet, such as Tim Berners-Lee. Additionally, the essay provides examples of countries and cities that have implemented free internet programs.The evidence presented in the essay is effective in supporting the supporting reasons. The statistics and expert opinions provide credibility to the argument, while the examples show that free internet is feasible and beneficial in practice.It is subjective to determine which is the most convincing between the essay “The Internet Should Be Free” and the two political ads. However, in terms of persuasiveness, the essay may be more convincing as it presents a well-researched and reasoned argument with concrete evidence to support its claims, whereas political ads often rely on emotional appeals and sound bites.One logical fallacy in the essay “The Internet Should Be Free” is the appeal to tradition fallacy. The essay argues that the internet is a public resource and should be available to all without cost because it has become a necessity in modern society. This argument implies that because the internet has always been a public resource, it should continue to be so. However, just because something has been a certain way in the past does not mean it is necessarily the best or most equitable option. This fallacy weakens the persuasiveness of the essay by relying on an unsound argument.

User Bruce Tong
by
7.6k points