93.7k views
0 votes
Both Nozick and Marion Young critique the Distributive Paradigm--compare/contrast these critiques (how are they different)? (PHILOSOPHY) help plsss

User Nhu Nguyen
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

The most important characteristic of Young's critique is its double-sidedness: not only does the distributive paradigm misconstrue important aspects of justice and turn questions of rights and power into questions of the distribution of goods; but it also fails to reach the heart of the matter of distribution itself, Nozick's response to such arguments is to claim that they rest on a false conception of distributive justice: they wrongly define a just distribution in terms of the pattern it exhibits at a given time.

Step-by-step explanation:

(I hope this helps)

User Neron Joseph
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.