Answer:
The most important characteristic of Young's critique is its double-sidedness: not only does the distributive paradigm misconstrue important aspects of justice and turn questions of rights and power into questions of the distribution of goods; but it also fails to reach the heart of the matter of distribution itself, Nozick's response to such arguments is to claim that they rest on a false conception of distributive justice: they wrongly define a just distribution in terms of the pattern it exhibits at a given time.
Step-by-step explanation:
(I hope this helps)