Question

Please help me

Consider this claim: Students who do not have at least a 3.0 GPA should not be allowed to have after-school jobs because they need to spend more time studying.


Use the 5-step process to write a counterclaim. (10 points)

1. Complete the following sentence: The claim states that ...

2. Cross out "The claim states that." What remains is your clearly stated position.

3. Complete the following sentence: Some may disagree because ...

4. Cross out "Some may disagree because." What remains is your purpose for writing.
5. Combine these two thoughts; this is your claim and your counterclaim.

Answer 1

1. The claim states that students who do not have at least a 3.0 GPA should not be allowed to have after-school jobs because they need to spend more time studying
2. Students with a GPA lower than 3.0 should be allowed to have after-school jobs.
3. Some may disagree because they believe that having a job can teach important life skills, such as time management and responsibility, that cannot be learned in the classroom. Additionally, some students may need to work to support themselves or their families, and preventing them from doing so could cause financial hardship.
4. My purpose for writing is to present a counterargument against the claim that students with a GPA lower than 3.0 should not be allowed to have after-school jobs, and to highlight the potential benefits and necessity of such employment for some students.
5. While maintaining a certain level of academic performance is important, it is not necessarily a prerequisite for having an after-school job. Allowing students with lower GPAs to work can provide valuable opportunities for them to develop important life skills and earn money to support themselves or their families. Therefore, prohibiting these students from having after-school jobs solely based on their GPA may not be fair or necessary.