Question

On election day, voters can go to the polls and cast their vote, or stay away and let others decide. In some countries, voters do not have that choice; they must go to the polls or face serious consequences. A compulsory voting law would require all citizens to cast a vote, but it would not require them to cast an informed vote. As a result, a compulsory voting law should not be passed in the United States because it would be bad for the electoral process.

Which states the main argument of the essay?

the first sentence
the second sentence
the third sentence
the fourth sentence

Answer 1

Answer: The main argument of the essay is stated in the fourth sentence: "As a result, a compulsory voting law should not be passed in the United States because it would be bad for the electoral process."

Step-by-step explanation:

The main argument of the essay is that a compulsory voting law should not be passed in the United States because it would be bad for the electoral process. The essay explains that while some countries have laws that require citizens to vote, such laws would not necessarily result in informed voting. In other words, just because someone is required to vote does not mean that they will make an informed choice, and this could potentially lead to negative consequences for the electoral process.

The essay argues that it is better to encourage informed voting through other means, such as voter education and outreach programs, rather than imposing a compulsory voting law. It suggests that such a law could actually be detrimental to the electoral process, as it may lead to a higher number of uninformed votes, which could ultimately undermine the legitimacy of election outcomes.

Therefore, the main argument of the essay is that while voting is important, it should not be mandatory, as such a law could result in negative consequences for the electoral process.