Final answer:
The correct statement for the hypothesis test at a 5% significance level is that there is a 5% chance we will conclude μ > 60 when, in fact, μ = 60, which is a Type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a company claims their average warranty length for a new laptop is longer than 60 days, and we set up a hypothesis test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, we establish two hypotheses:
- Null hypothesis (H0): μ = 60 days
- Alternative hypothesis (Ha): μ > 60 days
This is a right-tailed test because we are testing if the mean (μ) is greater than a certain value. With α = 0.05, if we end up rejecting the null hypothesis, it means that there is sufficient evidence at the 5% level of significance to support the company's claim that the average warranty is greater than 60 days. However, stating 'there is a 5% chance that μ > 60' is incorrect because the significance level refers to the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis. Therefore, the correct statement would be:
- There is a 5% chance we will conclude μ > 60, but in fact μ = 60.
This statement refers to the risk of a Type I error where we incorrectly reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true.