Final answer:
Lexical markers and language choices pose significant conflicts in the deaf community as they relate to cultural identity and educational pathways for deaf children. The debate encompasses the larger issues of linguistic marginalization and the socio-political aspects of language in various communities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The topic of lexical markers has caused much conflict in the deaf community because it touches upon different ideologies regarding language and identity. Parents of deaf children face challenging decisions about whether to immerse their child in deaf culture by sending them to a school for deaf children to learn American Sign Language (ASL) and be part of that cultural community, or to enroll them in mainstream schools and focus on verbal communication and lip-reading. These decisions can vary widely based on whether the parents are deaf themselves, as deaf parents may have a stronger inclination to integrate their child into the deaf culture they are a part of.
The Ebonics controversy and the linguistic marginalization of nonstandard vernaculars also reflect the complexities of language in social constructs, demonstrating how language is closely tied to ethnic identity, social status, and education policies. Such language debates are not unique to the deaf community but permeate various linguistic minority groups. The conflicts arise due to the integral role language plays in individual and group identities and the impact of linguistic choices on social and educational opportunities.