Final answer:
The continuation of the pattern of economic convergence is debated among economists, affected by globalization, technological spread, and varying national capacities. Political complexities and biases towards the status quo further contribute to the uncertain future of economic leveling.
Step-by-step explanation:
The debate about whether the pattern of economic convergence will continue is a complex one, involving a range of arguments both in favor and against the prospect. Supporters of convergence argue that as globalization continues, technologies and processes enabling productivity and economic growth will spread more uniformly across nations, leading to a leveling of the economic playing field. On the contrary, opponents posit that disparities in institutional quality, innovation capacities, and geopolitical advantages will likely maintain or even increase the economic divides.
Further complicating the issue are the complexities of political change and the prevalence of status quo biases, which underscore the difficulty of enacting systemic reforms that could foster or impede convergence. These challenges highlight the nuanced nature of economic projections and the multifaceted factors that contribute to global economic dynamics.