Final answer:
Claims that appear to be pseudoscience should be tested experimentally to determine their validity. Pseudoscience claims lack the rigorous testing that real science requires and should undergo the scientific method to be accepted as potentially true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Claims that appear to be pseudoscience should be tested experimentally. Pseudoscience is characterized by a claim, belief, or practice that presents itself as scientific but does not follow the rigorous standards and methods that define legitimate science. Thus, for a claim to be accepted, it must undergo experimental testing to determine if it can be supported or refuted through observation and adherence to the scientific method.
It is critical to understand the features of scientific explanations and hypotheses. A hypothesis must be a tentative statement that can be tested and potentially falsified. If experiments support the hypothesis, it may become more widely accepted and can lead to the development of a scientific theory. However, an experiment rejecting a hypothesis may still be successful, as it helps to refine scientific knowledge.
Therefore, options such as being accepted if said to have scientific validity without evidence or being promoted by the news media do not equate to a claim being scientifically valid. Only through experimental testing and verification against established scientific principles can a claim be considered to be potentially true.