Final answer:
The scientific process is distinguished from pseudoscience by its use of models and experiments for empirical testing and its focus on asking new questions to generate knowledge.
Step-by-step explanation:
The parts of the scientific process that differentiate it from pseudoscience are using models and experiments and asking new questions. These aspects are fundamental to scientific inquiry, as they involve empirical testing and the generation of new knowledge. In contrast, pseudoscience often makes claims based on anecdotal evidence or opinions and lacks the rigorous testing and falsifiability that characterize the scientific method. Making subjective claims and stating facts based on opinions are not part of the scientific process, whereas having explanations that answer all questions is not always possible, as science is an ongoing, iterative process.