Final answer:
Truthful subjects during an interview are usually consistent in their verbal and nonverbal cues, appearing relaxed and direct, whereas deceptive subjects may exhibit mismatched nonverbal signals like avoiding eye contact or fidgeting. Social pressures can cause people to misrepresent the truth, as seen in the Bradley effect, and interviewers can use careful observation of body language to assess candor. Research studies have analyzed various cues and tactics related to interviewee behaviors and their impact on perceptions of honesty.
Step-by-step explanation:
The attitudes commonly seen in truthful versus deceptive subjects during an interview can generally be distinguished through various verbal and nonverbal cues.
Truthful individuals tend to exhibit consistent body language and tone that aligns with their verbal messages, appearing more relaxed and direct in their communication
. In contrast, deceptive subjects may display incongruent nonverbal signals, such as avoiding eye contact, fidgeting, or presenting rehearsed responses that lack spontaneity.
Research in the field of interview and deception has explored numerous indicators that may signify deception. For instance, according to DePaulo et al. (1996), individuals may alter their responses to conform with societal norms or exhibit behaviors that they believe reflect positively on them.
Furthermore, according to Gilmore and Ferris (1989), interviewees might employ various impression management tactics that can influence an interviewer's judgment.
Liden, Martin, & Parsons (1993) emphasized the importance of analyzing visual and vocal cues to assess an applicant's personality traits like conscientiousness and extroversion, which can be signs of candidness or manipulative behavior.
Social pressure and the desire to maintain a certain image can lead individuals to provide false information, a concept illustrated by phenomena such as the Bradley effect. Individuals fear being perceived as politically incorrect, and therefore, they may lie or modify their true intentions during polls or interviews.
The objective stance of the interviewer, observing body language attentively, and being aware of nonverbal cues are essential to accurately assess truthfulness in subjects.