Question

How does Kya's lawyer defend Kya's choice of motel?

Answer 1

Kya's lawyer would defend her actions by possibly highlighting the human motives behind her choice of a motel and asserting her right to fair legal representation in accordance with constitutional law, as demonstrated in historical cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context provided, Kya's lawyer would defend her choice of a motel based on the given circumstances and her rights under the law. The examples shown demonstrate the complexities of the legal system and the role of a defense attorney in presenting a case that takes into account the rationale behind a client's actions, even if the law seems indifferent to motives. As Krogstad in the given text suggests, the law may disregard motives, but a skilled lawyer may still highlight them to portray their client in a more sympathetic light. Additionally, Kya's lawyer may invoke the defendant's constitutional rights, as established in cases like Gideon's Trumpet, ensuring that Kya receives a fair trial with the assistance of adequate legal representation, whether that be a privately hired lawyer or a public defender.

Answer 2

A lawyer would defend Kya's choice of motel by asserting her right to make personal decisions that contribute to her legal defense, aligning with the principles of the sixth amendment. The defense would suggest permissible reasons like safety, convenience, or strategic preparation, all to ensure the right to a fair trial.

Step-by-step explanation:

The lawyer's defense of Kya's choice of motel is likely to be rooted in the legal principle that all defendants are entitled to legal representation, regardless of their ability to pay, as established in landmark rulings such as the case of Gideon's Trumpet. In this context, a lawyer would argue for the rights of their client to an adequate defense, including the freedom to choose their dwelling as part of their defense strategy, so long as it does not violate any specific legal stipulations or court orders.

Since the circumstances provided do not detail specifics about Kya's situation, the lawyer could contend that her choice of motel was necessary either for personal safety, proximity to the court, affordability, or any other strategic reason pertaining to her case. Drawing from federal cases history, a defense attorney could imply that just as a right to a public defender is crucial, so are the personal decisions made by the accused to ensure they have the best possible defense.

The lawyer might also highlight the importance of the sixth amendment which assures the accused the right to a fair trial, which would implicitly include the autonomy to make choices that directly affect the preparation and execution of their legal defense.