114k views
2 votes
Mandatory minimum staffing ratios are being considered in the jurisdiction where a nurse-manager works. Based on experiences of other states, What possible result of this legislation can the nurse identify?

1) Predicted cost savings may take many years to realize.
2) Health care organizations may be more reluctant to hire new graduates.
3) There may be a backlash from clients and families.
4) Increased numbers of staff may not necessarily improve client care.

User Rafik
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Mandatory minimum staffing ratios could lead to delayed cost savings, hesitation in hiring new graduates by healthcare organizations, and an increased demand for nurses without guaranteed improvements in client care.

Step-by-step explanation:

In considering mandatory minimum staffing ratios, a nurse-manager might identify that predicted cost savings due to such legislation could take many years to realize. Additionally, there may be an economic impact where healthcare organizations might hesitate to hire new graduates due to increased costs associated with hiring more experienced and perhaps higher-paid nurses to meet the staffing requirements. Furthermore, mandatory staffing ratios might not automatically translate to improved client care, as increasing the quantity of staff does not inherently ensure the quality of care will be enhanced. It is also possible that hiring restrictions on less-trained healthcare workers could shift demand away from these roles, leading to a more competitive job market for nursing positions.

User Peter Elliott
by
8.5k points