Final answer:
Historical trial procedures have evolved over time and have been marked by a range of verdicts and appeals. Notable cases include mistrials in the segregation era South, the Nuremberg Trials of Nazi leaders, and the controversial trial of Sacco and Vanzetti. U.S. trials typically require unanimous jury decisions for a conviction.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to historical trials where the number of trials and the subsequent verdicts are important. In one particular case, there were a series of trials with multiple mistrials and appeals involving eight young men sentenced to death. Despite evidence to the contrary provided by some white individuals, two all-white Southern juries still recommended the death sentence. Even when a black juror was included for the first time since Reconstruction in Alabama, the predominately white jury found the defendants guilty and sentenced them to death under the laws that allowed a two-thirds majority to indict.
Another significant historical trial was the Nuremberg Trials, where 22 Nazi leaders were tried. This was a landmark international trial, and after a lengthy process, verdicts were issued almost a year later, which ranged from death to acquittals. In yet another noteworthy case, the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti sparked national and international outrage due to perceived injustices, leading to protests and significant literary and social reactions.
Trials in the United States generally require the agreement of all 12 jurors to convict a defendant, a system designed to ensure a fair trial and an impartial verdict. However, history has shown that trials and their outcomes, including the determination of how many trials and what was the verdict, can be contentious and often reflect societal issues such as racial prejudices and legal inadequacies at the time.