397,846 views
5 votes
5 votes
5. a Imagine that you are a school board member.

A parent comes to a school board meeting
and proposes that they'd like to see universal testing for special education services
implemented in your district. In other words, they would like every student to be tested fc
disabilities and possibly provided services. What might be an argument for having all
children tested for special education services? What are some arguments against it?

User Vishal Dasadiya
by
3.0k points

1 Answer

28 votes
28 votes

Answer: An argument for having all children tested for special education services is that it could help identify students who may be struggling in school and in need of additional support. This can help ensure that these students receive the services and accommodations they need to succeed in their education.

On the other hand, an argument against universal testing for special education services is that it could be expensive and time-consuming to administer these tests to every student in the district. Additionally, some people may argue that universal testing could lead to over-identification and over-diagnosis of disabilities, which could result in students being unnecessarily labeled and placed in special education programs. This could also lead to a stigmatization of students with disabilities, as well as a potential lack of resources for these programs.

User Douggard
by
3.2k points