Final answer:
The statement provided is false. The forceful removal of Native Americans was predicated on the acquisition and control of land by American settlers rather than conservation, and was justified by the belief in the 'civilizing' mission of the U.S. society.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Native American nations and tribes were often forcefully removed from areas that were deemed valuable for 'conservation' with one excuse being they were uncivilized and did not appreciate nature is false. The removal of Native American tribes was largely driven by the desire to acquire land for American settlers and was justified by the belief that Native Americans were 'uncivilized' and that it was the duty of American society to 'enlighten' them. Throughout the 19th century, policies were established that resulted in the loss of Native American land and cultural suppression. The enforcement of American laws, imposition of private land ownership, and prohibition of traditional religious practices were all means through which Native tribes were coerced into assimilation.
Reservations were set up, often far from ancestral lands, as seen with the Trail of Tears, which followed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. These brutal forced migrations caused significant cultural and economic consequences to the tribes involved. The characterizing of Native Americans as 'primitivist' and unappreciative of nature had substantial effects, including the legal seizure of their territories and the suppression of their rights and cultural practices.