140k views
3 votes
Would you rather have a boomerang that would find and kill any one person of your choosing, anywhere in the world, but can only be used once or a boomerang that always returns to you with one dollar?

A) Boomerang for targeted killing
B) Boomerang for financial gain
C) None of the above
D) Can't Decide

User Quimby
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

This hypothetical scenario involves ethical decision-making and falls under Social Studies. It presents a choice between a boomerang for targeted killing, one for financial gain, or opting out of the decision.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question you've asked seems to be a hypothetical scenario more suited for an ethical discussion rather than a specific academic subject. However, if we were to categorize it, it would fall under Social Studies, as it engages with ethical considerations and decision-making. The options provided all have significant consequences and moral implications. The first option, a boomerang for targeted killing, poses an ethical dilemma of taking a life, which has serious legal and moral consequences. The second option, a boomerang that always returns with one dollar, could be seen as a way to gain financial benefit without harming anyone. The third option is a refusal to participate in the scenario, which could represent a moral stance against the choices given. Lastly, indecision reflects the complexity of the choices presented.

User Benjamin Allison
by
8.2k points