Final answer:
Supreme Court rulings are subject to checks from the executive and legislative branches, as its power is balanced by the need for judicial implementation. The Court's influence on policy can be curtailed when its decisions are not enforced, highlighting the interdependence of government branches.
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the Supreme Court rarely makes broad and clear-cut statements, rulings are often appealed for further review, and the ability of the judicial branch to check the executive and legislative branches has been questioned. The Supreme Court hears cases involving federal law and acts as the nation's final court of appeal with the power to declare laws and actions by the executive branch unconstitutional. Yet, its power is not absolute and is balanced by the checks and influences from the executive and legislative branches.
Through nominations, the president can impact the court's composition, potentially swaying its direction. Additionally, judicial implementation is a significant check on the Court, as the Court's decisions require the executive and legislative branches to enforce and implement them. This dependency underscores the interconnected nature of the government's branches and highlights the limitations of the judiciary, which lacks the direct means to enforce its rulings.
This delicate balance of power maintains a system of checks and balances where no single branch can assert unchecked authority, ensuring democratic governance and adherence to the Constitution.