Final answer:
The condition not required for Ms. Floot's presumption of non-residency is 'C) She did not leave taxable Canadian property in Canada'. Other factors like not leaving social ties, not returning frequently, and establishing permanent residence elsewhere are more directly related to residency status.
Step-by-step explanation:
The condition that does NOT have to be met for Ms. Floot to be presumed a non-resident of Canada is C) She did not leave taxable Canadian property in Canada. Taxable Canadian property can include real estate in Canada, business assets, and certain shares of Canadian corporations, but it does not determine residency status for tax purposes on its own. The other conditions listed (not leaving personal property or social ties, not returning frequently, leaving a spouse or dependants, and establishing permanent residence elsewhere) are more directly related to establishing her residential ties and tax status.
For someone to be considered a non-resident for Canadian tax purposes, significant residential ties to Canada typically must not exist. Establishing a permanent residence in another country (E), not leaving a spouse or dependents (D), and not maintaining personal property or social ties (A) are key factors that Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers. Not returning to Canada regularly (B) also supports the case for non-residency.