Final answer:
Radical ecological ethics have a distinctively political element and require us to change the way we live and function.
Step-by-step explanation:
True. According to James Friesen, radical ecological ethics have a distinctively political element. They require us to change the way we live and function. This implies that embracing ecological ethics involves not only individual actions but also political engagement and systemic change. Radical ecological ethics indeed have a distinctively political element, as stated by James Friesen, necessitating a transformative approach to how we live and function in society. The truth of this statement is evidenced by the principles of deep ecology and social ecology, which argue for a fundamental change in our perception of human-nature relationships and address social issues as intertwined with environmental concerns. Deep ecology emphasizes the intrinsic value of all living things and our interconnectedness with nature, advocating for a respect and care for the natural world that may conflict with traditional human-centered (anthropocentric) views. Social ecology, on the other hand, critiques capitalism's treatment of nature as a commodity and suggests that environmental problems stem from broader political and economic systems that also reinforce inequity. Therefore, embracing a more eco-centric ethical framework would inevitably involve political action and alterations in socio-economic systems and personal lifestyles to be more sustainable and equitable.