Final answer:
Gradual oppression in Napoleon's regime was more successful than brute force because it slowly increased control without prompting immediate rebellion, and because the strategies Napoleon used fostered loyalty, making harsh measures less necessary.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question 'Explain, in your own words, why gradual oppression was more successful for Napoleon's regime than brute force.' pertains to the effectiveness of Napoleon Bonaparte's strategies in consolidating power and controlling territories. Gradual oppression allowed for more subtle and sustainable control compared to overt brute force, which often led to immediate and forceful resistance. Gradual oppression worked by making changes that seemed less threatening and thereby kept the animals complacent, avoiding the provocation of a strong backlash that would disrupt control. Napoleon's method of oppression was essentially stealthy, making it difficult for opposition to organize quickly or effectively. This contrasts with brute force, which tends to unite and galvanize opposition against the oppressor due to its immediate impact on people's lives.Moreover, Napoleon's military success and his policies built loyalty among his soldiers and the French people, reducing the necessity for brutality to maintain power. The use of Napoleonic propaganda and the selective reinstatement of the nobility further exemplified his strategic approach to maintaining his regime's stability without relying solely on force.