Question

The Miranda warning insures that the criminal suspects understand their constitutional rights relating to:

A) search and seizure.
B) self-incrimination.
C) cruel and unusual punishment.
D) double-jeopardy

Answer 1

The Miranda warning ensures suspects understand their right against self-incrimination, requiring officials to inform them of this right and others related to the right to counsel and silence before interrogation.

This became a constitutional requirement following the Miranda v. Arizona ruling in 1966.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Miranda warning ensures that criminal suspects understand their constitutional rights, with a focus on the right against self-incrimination.

Established in the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona, it requires that suspects be informed of their rights before interrogation, which includes the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything they say can be used against them in court. The Miranda rights are a critical component of due process and safeguard against coerced confessions.

Miranda v. Arizona highlighted the importance of protecting the Fifth Amendment rights of suspects, which includes the right not to incriminate oneself.

When Ernesto Miranda was arrested without being informed of these rights, the Supreme Court ruled that any statements he made during custodial interrogation could not be used against him because the procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination were not used.