Final Answer:
In "De Oratore," Cicero appears contradictory in terms of eloquence and delivery by advocating a balanced approach to oratory, emphasizing the importance of both natural talent and systematic training, while also underscoring the significance of innate abilities in achieving true eloquence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cicero's apparent contradiction in "De Oratore" arises from his nuanced exploration of the elements that contribute to eloquence. On one hand, Cicero emphasizes the significance of natural talent, arguing that eloquence is an innate gift that cannot be fully acquired through training alone. This perspective aligns with the belief that certain individuals possess an inherent aptitude for persuasive speech. On the other hand, Cicero advocates for systematic training and education, asserting that individuals must refine their innate abilities through rigorous study and practice to achieve true eloquence. This dual emphasis on both innate talent and acquired skill creates a tension in Cicero's philosophy, leading to the perception of contradiction in his views on eloquence and delivery.
Cicero's approach reflects the complexities of oratory, recognizing the role of both nature and nurture in the development of a skilled orator. While he acknowledges the importance of innate gifts, Cicero also underscores the need for disciplined training to refine and amplify those natural abilities. The apparent contradiction emerges from the delicate balance Cicero seeks to strike between the spontaneous, innate aspects of oratory and the structured, cultivated elements. Overall, Cicero's exploration of eloquence in "De Oratore" is marked by this tension, contributing to the richness and depth of his treatise on the art of persuasive speech.