Final answer:
Licensees should ethically and preferably follow up any verbal notifications of changes to a counseling agreement with written documentation.
Police practices that omit informing individuals of their right to counsel and protection against self-incrimination during interrogations are a violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Regarding the question of whether a licensee can verbally inform a client of any changes to the counseling agreement, there are ethical and legal standards to consider.
Generally, it's essential to provide clients with clear and understandable information regarding any changes to the services they will be receiving. Best practices often suggest that significant alterations to a counseling agreement should not only be communicated verbally but also followed up with written documentation.
In the context of the legal rights of individuals during police interrogation, it is indeed a violation of the Fifth Amendment if the police practice of interrogating individuals occurs without notifying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination.
This is underscored by the landmark case Miranda v. Arizona, which established the requirement for law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights before any custodial interrogation.