Final answer:
The relationship between quantity and quality of work in classical music has been historically biased towards prolific white, European male composers. Innovators challenged this norm, showing that quality also lies in boundary-pushing and emotion. Recognizing diverse compositions for their intrinsic merit can redefine what is considered high-quality classical music.
Step-by-step explanation:
The relationship between the quantity and quality of work among great classical musicians varies significantly. Traditionally, in music history classes, emphasis has been placed on the prolific works of white, European male composers, seen as the pinnacle of classical music.
However, this has led to other composers, particularly women and those from underrepresented groups, being overlooked, despite the high quality of their compositions.
During different periods, such as the transition from classical to romantic, attitudes towards music's structures and boundaries changed. Romantic composers like Berlioz, Strauss, and Wagner desired to challenge audiences and push beyond the accepted norms, showing that quality is not solely defined by adherence to tradition but also by the ability to innovate and evoke emotion.
It is essential to recognize that repertoire diversity can demonstrate excellence in music without being contingent on the composer's background. Advocating for music based on its intrinsic value, rather than the race or gender of its creator, can shift the focus towards the quality of the composition itself, thereby enriching musical experiences and broadening the criteria for what is considered 'worthy' music.