167k views
4 votes
In your opinion, does Steinem make a strong argument? Would you have supported the ERA? Why

or why not?

User Sherleen
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

I find Steinem's argument for the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) compelling.

How to explain

Her emphasis on constitutional safeguards against gender-based discrimination highlights a crucial need for legal parity. I would support the ERA due to its aim of rectifying gender disparities and promoting equal rights.

Despite concerns about potential unintended consequences, like impacting protective laws for women, the ERA's potential to solidify legal safeguards for gender equality is significant.

Steinem's advocacy aligns with fundamental values of fairness and equality, emphasizing the importance of legal reinforcement in securing gender equality under the law.

The Complete Question

Gloria Steinem's argument in favor of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) centers on the necessity of constitutional protection to address gender-based discrimination and inequality. She underscores the significance of legally enshrining equal rights for all individuals, irrespective of gender, within the framework of the Constitution. Steinem emphasizes that without a constitutional amendment explicitly prohibiting sex-based discrimination, women remain vulnerable to unequal treatment under the law. Her argument emphasizes the urgent need for the ERA to close existing gaps in legal rights, ensuring that gender equality is firmly established and legally protected at the highest level of governance. Steinem's advocacy highlights the ERA as a critical step toward a fair and just society, promoting equal opportunities and protections for all genders.

User Sunil Kumar Jha
by
8.1k points