Final answer:
Adeimantus supports Glaucon's views by discussing the rewards of seeming just and questioning traditional virtue education, aligning with discussions on the essence of justice.
Step-by-step explanation:
Adeimantus bolsters Glaucon's argument about justice in Plato's Republic by elaborating on the rewards and social prestige associated with a reputation for justice, rather than the intrinsic value of being just. He argues that people act justly not because it is inherently the right thing to do, but because of the benefits it brings, such as a good reputation and the advantages that come along with it.
Furthermore, Adeimantus challenges the effectiveness of traditional education in instilling true virtue, suggesting that such education does not lead to a deep understanding or desire for justice, but only a desire to seem just. This perspective aligns with Socrates' discussions about the nature of the just life, and the contrast between the appearances and the essence of justice.