93.5k views
4 votes
From which of the following patients should used anesthesia equipment be considered contaminated, regardless of whether or not there is visible evidence of contamination?

A) Patients with hepatitis C
B) Patients with prion disease
C) Patients with TB
D) Patients with isolation orders for transmission-based precautions
E) All patients regardless of infectious disease states

User Javis
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

Used anesthesia equipment should be considered contaminated in the case of patients with prion diseases due to their resistance to standard sterilization procedures and potential to cause nosocomial diseases.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the list provided, used anesthesia equipment should be considered contaminated, regardless of whether or not there is visible evidence of contamination, from patients with prion disease. Prion diseases, such as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), are known for their capacity to adhere to surgical instruments and withstand normal decontamination procedures. As a result, equipment used on patients with prion diseases can harbor these infectious agents and pose a danger even after typical cleaning and sterilization processes.

Health-care associated infections can also arise from equipment contaminated with drug-resistant bacteria or viruses. While hepatitis C and tuberculosis (TB) are serious infections, standard decontamination procedures are typically effective at removing these pathogens from medical equipment. Patients with isolation orders for transmission-based precautions should also be considered as sources of potential contamination, especially if the equipment has visible evidence of contamination. However, all used medical equipment should be handled with care and subjected to proper decontamination procedures to prevent the spread of potential nosocomial diseases.

User Kerwyn
by
8.5k points