Final answer:
The missing dimension in much of the CQI literature is the psychosocial aspect, focusing on the less tangible aspects of human experience that aren't accounted for in traditional social well-being measures. It also includes the importance of public acceptance and integrating environmental, health, and aesthetic concerns into the CQI narrative.
Step-by-step explanation:
In contemporary research on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), critics have noted that there is a missing dimension from much of the CQI literature. According to Locke (2005) and Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso (2004), there is a lack of consistency in the definition and description of CQI, and the results of studies are often hard to measure and verify empirically. Taking this into account, it can be suggested that the psychosocial dimension is what is missing from the current CQI narratives. This dimension would address the less tangible aspects of human experience, such as emotional and social well-being, which are often overlooked in conventional measures of social well-being.
Furthermore, the attention to public acceptance and how well it is integrated into community mindsets, as noted by Lidicker (1998), is another aspect that tends to be underrepresented in the literature. The inclusion of environmental concerns, threats to health and safety, and the impact on natural aesthetics are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of CQI's effects. This broader, more inclusive approach would be more aligned with the acknowledged importance of considering such factors in assessing human life conditions and planning for the future.