Final answer:
Jose is participating in a 360-degree performance appraisal, where multiple sources including himself, his supervisor, peers, and subordinates provide feedback on his performance. While the effectiveness and reliability of these appraisals are debated, they can lead to improved performance and a better understanding of an employee's role in the organization.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jose is involved in a 360-degree performance appraisal, a comprehensive method of performance evaluation. In a 360-degree appraisal, feedback on an employee's performance is gathered from multiple sources, including the employee's supervisor, peers, direct reports, and sometimes even customers. The process also includes self-evaluation. The accumulated feedback provides diverse perspectives, which can be used to improve the employee's performance through recognition, training, or other developmental methods. This system of appraisal is commonly used to make decisions on an employee's position and compensation and is seen as more complex and potentially more informative than traditional performance appraisals.
Despite the theoretical benefits, performance appraisals, and specifically 360-degree feedback appraisals, can be contentious. Studies such as those by Atkins and Wood (2002) question the reliability of self and peer assessments. There are complexities and cultural considerations within organizations that can influence the effectiveness of these systems. However, others argue that the discrepancies in ratings can also lead to beneficial discussions and learning opportunities for employees (Tornow, 1993b).