85.7k views
0 votes
Which of the following is least important to understanding economic change in the united states?

O joseph smith's discovery of gold tablets arguments over the tariff.
O government support for roads and other infrastructure.
O the california gold rush.

User Pnavk
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Joseph Smith's discovery of gold tablets is irrelevant to the economic changes in the U.S., while tariffs, infrastructure, and the California gold rush have had significant impacts on its economy.

Step-by-step explanation:

Out of the options listed, Joseph Smith's discovery of gold tablets is the least important to understanding economic change in the United States.

Joseph Smith is associated with the founding of the Latter Day Saint movement, not economic changes in the U.S. In contrast, arguments over the tariff, government support for roads and other infrastructure, and the California gold rush each played significant roles in shaping the economic landscape of the United States.

The gold rush in particular spurred massive population growth and economic activity in California, while tariffs and infrastructure development are directly related to national economic policy and growth.

User Himujjal
by
8.4k points