The reactions of Latin American leaders to the events in Hispaniola/Haiti during the late colonial era indeed varied significantly, reflecting complex socio-political dynamics and differing perspectives on independence.
The creole aristocracy, composed of local elites born in the Americas of European descent, harbored apprehensions about supporting independence movements.
Their hesitancy stemmed from fears of potential repercussions, particularly the prospect of slave rebellions and uprisings among marginalized groups within their own territories.
They were also concerned about losing control over their colonies and the subsequent influence of European powers in the region.
Contrastingly, certain well educated elites, including figures like Bolívar, San Martín, Pedro I of Brazil, and Iturbide of Mexico, spearheaded successful movements for independence.
These leaders possessed a broader vision and understanding of nationhood and self governance, advocating for liberation from colonial rule.
Their efforts, however, encountered resistance from various quarters, including the majority race mixed population, which, in some instances, remained loyal to the colonial homeland, influenced by cultural ties or socio economic factors.
which best describes leaders of Latin America reaction to events on the island of Hispaniola Haiti in the late colonial era.
While some elites were cautious due to potential repercussions, others forged ahead, championing independence despite facing opposition and resistance from certain segments of society.