Final answer:
The statement regarding Leon Kass's view on the interconnection between debates on genetic screening, prenatal diagnosis, and abortion is true. PGD, a form of genetic screening, cannot diagnose the inheritance of sexually transmitted diseases. Ethical questions related to PGD touch upon health perceptions, societal consequences, and reproductive rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Leon Kass, the debate about genetic screening and prenatal diagnosis is closely related to discussions on abortion. The statement you've presented is true. Genetic screening techniques such as Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) are used to test embryos for genetic conditions before they are implanted in the uterus during in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. Importantly, the choice of whether to implant an embryo may be influenced by the presence of genetic conditions, which brings us to the intersection with the abortion debate. One condition that cannot be diagnosed through PGD is the inheritance of sexually transmitted diseases since PGD focuses on genetic anomalies rather than infections that may occur later.
Here are three questions related to the ethical and social issues of using PGD:
- How does the use of PGD impact our understanding of what constitutes a "healthy" or "desirable" child?
- What are the potential societal consequences of widespread use of genetic screening in terms of diversity and inclusion?
- How does PGD intersect with issues of reproductive rights and the autonomy of prospective parents?